Why This is Shocking in Peacetime
The fact that Zimbabwe, a country not currently experiencing war or major civil unrest, is unable to host international football matches is indeed shocking and unusual. Here’s why:
Infrastructure Expectations: In peacetime, countries are generally expected to maintain and develop their infrastructure, including sports facilities. The inability to do so raises questions about governance and resource allocation.
Economic Implications: Zimbabwe is not under international sanctions that would prevent it from importing materials or hiring expertise to maintain its stadiums. This suggests deep-rooted economic issues affecting even high-profile national projects.
National Pride: Football is often a source of national pride. The inability to host home games can be seen as embarrassing on the international stage, especially for a country with Zimbabwe’s football heritage.
Continuous Problem: This isn’t a new or temporary issue, but one that has persisted since September of the previous year, indicating a lack of urgency or ability to address the problem quickly.
Regional Comparison: Many of Zimbabwe’s neighbors, including countries with similar or lower GDPs, manage to maintain CAF-approved stadiums. This stark contrast is particularly alarming.
Impact on Sports Development: Without proper facilities, the development of local talent and the growth of the sport at grassroots levels can be severely hampered.
Lost Economic Opportunities: Home games typically bring economic benefits to the host city through tourism and local spending. These opportunities are being lost to other countries.
Peacetime Priorities: In peacetime, governments typically prioritize projects that boost national morale and international standing. The failure to maintain a national stadium capable of hosting international matches seems to contradict these expected priorities.
This situation underscores deeper issues within Zimbabwe’s sports administration and possibly its broader governance and economic management. It serves as a stark reminder that even in peacetime, countries can face significant challenges in maintaining what many would consider basic national infrastructure.
